So there was a seminar today about quality management. I learned a lot. The speaker, Sir Edwin from the Registrar’s Office of the main campus could fill a book – maybe even more – on just his anecdotes about inefficient service provision and his attempts at improving his own office.
First point that stuck to mind is the double standard of people when on different sides of the service “counter”.
We sometimes have unrealistically high expectations when we are paying for service, but we are full of excuses for the even relatively low quality of service when we are on the delivering end.
What I can see here is a parallel to the students and the give and take relationship we have here in school.
Students are quick to complain about something wrong with the school, but when those same exacting standards are applied to the work demanded of them, it’s still all whining about how difficult it is.
Sir Edwin also gave a checklist for troubleshooting: correct the problem first, then find the source if it wasn’t discovered in the first step, then make sure that it doesn’t happen again. He said that a lot of offices interchange the first and second steps, playing the blame game, which doesn’t solve the problem quickly.
There’s also something to be said about going the extra mile in your work, as it impresses the client, or in the case of the work of the student, it impresses the teacher, which may give them pause from failing a student who suddenly falters towards the end of the term. Please take note that this does not work if it’s bad performance first then a sudden burst of desperate work after course card distribution.
As for excuses, just like a customer will not go back to a store which gives shoddy service, maybe even if they improve, the same is true with a teacher who experiences lackluster submissions from a student as a first impression.
The student will have to work that much harder to erase that bad impression (sometimes subconsciously) of the teacher to get a fair grade. Again, as I said, this may not be intentional on the part of some teachers.
It’s really amazing how most if not all of the things he said that is supposedly geared towards how to run the school actually works for inside the classroom. But then, isn’t what the teacher simulates in the classroom supposed to be a reflection of how a student is supposed to approach his life after graduation?
I will be trying to revise the slides we were given for consumption of the student leaders and maybe the general population as well.
@@ Daily Leadership Lesson September 16 - You’ve removed most of the roadblocks to success when you’ve learned the difference between motion and direction. - Bill Copeland
My take on this: there is a similar saying that goes “just because you’re moving doesn’t mean you’re going somewhere.”
Sometimes it matters more where you are headed than how fast you actually go. It’s not about the journey, it’s the destination.
Okay, that last one has been repeated as being the other way around, but as far as I’m concerned it works both ways depending on who you ask. Anyway, bottom like seems to be the capability of going somewhere isn’t worth much unless you have a clear idea of your end goal.
